プラグイン名	Survey Maker
脆弱性の種類	アクセス制御の不備
CVE番号	CVE-2025-64276
緊急	低い
CVE公開日	2025-11-16
ソースURL	CVE-2025-64276

Survey Maker <= 5.1.9.4 — Broken Access Control (CVE-2025-64276): What WordPress Site Owners Must Do Today

著者： WP-Firewall セキュリティチーム
日付： 2025-11-18
タグ: WordPress, Vulnerability, WAF, Survey Maker, Security

まとめ

On 14 November 2025 a broken access control vulnerability affecting the WordPress plugin Survey Maker (versions <= 5.1.9.4) was disclosed (CVE-2025-64276). The vendor released version 5.1.9.5 which addresses the issue. The vulnerability allows users with a low-level privilege (“Contributor”) to perform actions they should not be able to do due to missing authorization checks — a classical broken access control problem.

As a WordPress security provider, WP-Firewall is sharing a practical, expert-focused guide to help site owners understand the risk, detect abuse, and mitigate exposure immediately — including short-term virtual patches and longer-term remediation and hardening steps.

This article covers:

• What broken access control is and why it matters for WordPress.
• Technical details and real-world impact of CVE-2025-64276.
• How to detect attempts and signs of exploitation.
• Immediate mitigation steps (including virtual patching at the firewall level).
• Long-term remediation, hardening and monitoring recommendations.
• Incident response checklist if you suspect compromise.
• How WP-Firewall can help (including our free plan).

---

Understanding the vulnerability: Broken access control in a survey plugin

Broken access control means that an application is not enforcing who can do what. In WordPress it usually manifests when a plugin fails to:

• Check that the currently authenticated user has the correct capability (e.g., 管理オプション, 編集投稿).
• Verify or validate nonces intended to protect actions.
• Restrict operations to the correct HTTP methods or authenticated contexts.

For Survey Maker (<= 5.1.9.4) the issue allowed a user with Contributor-level privileges to execute a higher-privilege action because the plugin omitted proper authorization / nonce verification for specific endpoints or functions. Contributors usually have limited rights: they can create and edit their own posts but are intentionally limited from administrative plugin actions. An absence of checks enables privilege escalation within the plugin’s own domain — and this can be leveraged by threat actors to persist, change content, or prepare further attacks.

The vulnerability received the identifier CVE-2025-64276 and was rated with a CVSS score coming in at 6.5 (medium/low priority). While that score indicates a moderate impact, the real risk depends on the specifics of your site: number of low-privileged accounts, whether the plugin is active and exposed, and whether you have layered protections.

---

Why WordPress sites should take this seriously

• Many shared WordPress sites permit contributor or subscriber roles (e.g., guest authors, community contributors). Attackers will purposely create or compromise low-privilege accounts and then exploit plugin flaws like this one to gain functionality beyond those roles.
• Plugins that interact with front-end forms, AJAX endpoints or stored data are frequently targeted because they expose action handlers that can be invoked by low-privilege users or even unauthenticated requests.
• Even if immediate full site takeover is not possible, a privileged action within a plugin can be used to plant backdoors, export sensitive data, change survey results or inject malicious scripts in public pages — all of which damage reputation and can escalate into larger compromises.

---

Immediate actions (first 24–72 hours)

If you run WordPress and have Survey Maker active, take the following steps now. These measures are prioritized for speed and safety.

1. Update the plugin
   • Update Survey Maker to version 5.1.9.5 or later as soon as possible. This is the only guaranteed fix for the vulnerability.
   • Use WP Admin > Plugins or WP-CLI: wp plugin update survey-maker --version=5.1.9.5
2. If you cannot update immediately, disable the plugin
   • Temporarily deactivate Survey Maker until you can safely apply the update. This removes the vulnerable code from the execution path.
3. Restrict contributor accounts
   • Review your user list for Contributor accounts you don’t recognize.
   • Suspend or delete unused or suspicious accounts.
   • For community sites, consider using capability-limiting plugins to restrict contributors or reduce privileges.
4. Apply short-term WAF rules (virtual patch)
   • Deploy application-layer rules to block the exact patterns of abusive requests related to the plugin endpoints. A good virtual patch prevents exploitation until you can update.
   • Example mitigation approach:
     • Block POST requests to plugin-specific AJAX actions invoked by low-privilege contexts.
     • Require valid WordPress nonces for plugin admin actions.
     • Block requests that attempt to perform privileged actions from non-admin IPs or unauthenticated sessions.
5. Monitor logs
   • Immediately start monitoring for unusual admin-ajax calls or any request patterns related to Survey Maker.
   • Increase logging level temporarily for admin endpoints and REST endpoints.
6. バックアップ
   • Ensure you have a clean backup (files + database) from prior to any suspected exploitation for quick recovery if needed.

---

How attackers may exploit this (attack scenarios)

Realistic scenarios of what a malicious low-privileged account could do if the plugin’s access control is broken:

• Create or modify a survey with malicious links or payloads to perform phishing or distribute malware to visitors.
• Modify survey settings to redirect respondents or exfiltrate form response data.
• Upload media or files through a plugin endpoint and hide web shells in allowed file types (if the plugin provides an upload mechanism).
• Change plugin configuration to leak API keys or credentials stored in settings pages.
• Use the plugin actions to trigger operations that create scheduled tasks, add new admin users indirectly, or write content that grants lateral movement.

None of these need initial administrator access; all can be triggered by exploiting a functionality that should be limited but is not.

---

Detecting exploitation — what to look for

If you suspect attempted or successful exploitation, check for the following indicators:

Server and application logs:

• Repeated or unusual POST requests to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php containing suspicious アクション values related to Survey Maker.
• Unexpected requests to plugin-specific PHP endpoints (e.g., plugin folder paths like /wp-content/plugins/survey-maker/...).
• Requests with absent or invalid nonces for admin operations.
• Suspicious user-agent strings, rapid request bursts or requests from unusual geolocations.

WordPress-level signs:

• New or modified surveys that site administrators did not create.
• Changes in plugin settings (redirect URLs, API keys, email addresses).
• Unexpected scheduled tasks (WP-Cron jobs) appearing in tools like WP Control.
• Newly created admin or editor accounts, or changed capabilities on existing accounts.
• Changes in content or unexpected scripts in page/post content.

File system and database checks:

• New files in wp-content/アップロード or plugin directories that you did not add.
• Database entries in plugin-related tables that show unexpected data.
• Presence of web shell signatures (PHP eval/base64 strings) or unknown PHP files in writable directories.

Use WP-Firewall’s scan or comparable malware scanners to audit file changes and known malicious signatures. But note: clever backdoors can be obfuscated — manual review and indicator-of-compromise checks are essential.

---

Example WAF / Virtual patch rules (conceptual)

Below are conceptual examples of rules you can apply at the application firewall level. Do not paste them verbatim into production without testing. Fine-tune to your environment and plugin specifics.

1. Block unauthenticated access to admin-only plugin actions
   • Condition: Request to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php AND POST AND アクション in [list of plugin admin actions] AND user not logged in OR user role is contributor
   • Action: Block/Rate-limit
2. Require nonce presence for sensitive actions
   • Condition: Request to plugin endpoint for action X AND missing _wpnonce parameter OR nonce invalid
   • アクション: ブロックしてログに記録
3. Restrict plugin admin endpoints to administrator IPs
   • Condition: Request to /wp-admin/admin.php?page=survey-maker AND source IP not in admin IP list
   • Action: Block
4. Block suspicious upload names / content detected in plugin directories
   • Condition: File upload requests with .php or encoded payloads and destination under plugin or uploads directory
   • Action: Block and quarantine

Recommended rule (regex example for admin-ajax action pattern):

• Detect calls to suspicious actions: action=(survey_|sm_|srr_).* (tune to exact plugin action prefixes).
• If action matches and the request is from non-admin user, deny.

Note: These are examples — a professional firewall (like WP-Firewall) can apply precise vPatch rules that target the specific vulnerability pattern without affecting legitimate usage.

---

Step-by-step remediation checklist

1. Update Survey Maker to 5.1.9.5 or later.
2. If update is not immediately possible: deactivate the plugin.
3. Scan site for indicators of compromise:
   • File integrity scan: check modified files since last clean backup.
   • Database sanity checks: inspect plugin-related tables for unexpected entries.
4. 資格情報をローテーションする:
   • Reset all administrator passwords.
   • Rotate API keys or tokens stored in plugin settings.
5. Audit users:
   • Remove or suspend unrecognized contributor/subscriber accounts.
   • Enforce strong passwords and enable MFA for admin/editor accounts.
6. Harden WordPress:
   • Review role capabilities; remove excessive privileges.
   • アクセスを制限する wp-admin by IP if possible.
   • Disable file editing via wp-config.php: 'DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT' を true で定義します。
7. Apply WAF virtual patch rules until the plugin is updated and verified clean.
8. Restore from a known clean backup if compromise indicators are present and cannot be cleaned quickly and safely.
9. Monitor logs for two weeks post-remediation for signs of reattempted exploitation.

---

How a modern WordPress firewall prevents this kind of attack

A layered firewall approach reduces the attack surface and gives you time even when a plugin is vulnerable:

• Contextual request inspection: Blocks requests that attempt to call admin-only plugin actions from non-admin contexts — irrespective of whether the plugin itself checks capabilities.
• Virtual patching: Implements rules that stop exploit patterns at the HTTP layer; this prevents exploitation even if a patch isn’t installed yet.
• Behavioral analytics: Detects anomalous user actions (Contributors suddenly performing admin-like operations) and raises alerts or auto-responds by blocking.
• Nonce and capability enforcement: WAF can require presence and validity of nonces for sensitive endpoints, forcing an additional verification layer.
• Rate limiting and IP reputation: Reduces brute-force, automated exploitation attempts.
• File upload inspection: Blocks suspicious uploads that could lead to code execution.

These protections are especially valuable for site owners who cannot instantly update or who run multi-tenant installations with many third-party plugins.

---

Detection patterns and logging guidance (practical)

Set up focused logging and retention for these items:

• Admin-ajax monitoring: Log full requests that reference 管理者-ajax.php and capture アクション パラメータ。
• REST API endpoints: Log POST/PUT requests to plugin-related REST routes.
• Authentication events: Capture role changes, new users added, and password resets.
• File system changes: Maintain file change logs and alert on new PHP files in uploads or plugin folders.
• WP-Cron changes: Log newly scheduled tasks and task creators.

Search queries you can use to find suspicious entries:

• In server logs: grep for 管理者-ajax.php and the survey plugin folder or action names.
• In database: look in plugin tables for rows with created_by fields that relate to contributor IDs or unexpected timestamps.

Example log search:

grep "admin-ajax.php" /var/log/nginx/access.log | grep -Ei "action=(sm_|survey_)"

---

Incident response: if you suspect exploitation

Follow an IR process that minimizes damage and helps recovery:

1. 隔離する
   • Take the site into maintenance mode, or restrict access to admins only.
   • If hosted on shared infrastructure, inform your host and follow their guidance.
2. Preserve
   • Snapshot current files and database for forensic analysis.
   • Export logs (webserver, WAF logs, cron logs).
3. Eradicate
   • Apply the plugin update or deactivate the plugin if not possible.
   • Remove injected files, malicious scheduled tasks, and backdoors.
   • Replace compromised user accounts and rotate affected credentials.
4. Recover
   • Restore from a pre-compromise backup if necessary.
   • Validate the site by scanning for malware and re-testing plugin functionality.
   • Re-enable normal operations only after verifying the issue is resolved.
5. Review and learn
   • Determine how the attacker exploited the vulnerability and document lessons learned.
   • Strengthen processes (prompt updates, stricter onboarding for contributors, scheduled security audits).

---

Hardening checklist for WordPress sites using third-party plugins

• Keep WordPress core, themes, and plugins updated. Enable auto-updates for plugins you trust where safe.
• Minimize installed plugins — disable and remove any you don’t actively use.
• Reduce the number of privileged users. Give the least privilege necessary.
• Use strong passwords and enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrators.
• Restrict access to wp-admin by IP where possible.
• Disable file editor in WordPress (DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT).
• Maintain regular offsite backups (files + DB), and periodically test restores.
• Use a managed firewall that supports virtual patching and behavioral protection.
• Schedule regular security scans and file integrity checks.
• Monitor logs and set up alerts for unusual admin-ajax or REST API activity.

---

Why timely patching and virtual patching matter

Patching is definitive: it removes the vulnerable code. But in real life, immediate patching is not always possible — a change may need testing, or you may be managing hundreds of sites. That’s where virtual patching provides a practical bridge: it enforces protective rules at the firewall level to prevent exploitation without changing plugin code or interrupting service.

Virtual patching is not a replacement for updates; it is an emergency measure to minimize risk while you implement a permanent fix.

---

よくある質問

Q: If CVE-2025-64276 requires “Contributor” privileges, does that mean my site is safe?

A: Not necessarily. If you allow user registrations, guest posts or have contributors who can be compromised, an attacker can gain contributor access and exploit the issue. Public-facing sites with contributor workflows are at higher risk.

Q: Can I just block admin-ajax.php completely?

A: No. Many legitimate plugins use 管理者-ajax.php for frontend functionality. Blocking this entirely can break features. Instead, create rules that target specific actions or require nonces/capabilities for sensitive actions.

Q: Will disabling the plugin break my site?

A: Deactivating Survey Maker will stop its functionality (surveys will not display or work) but is a valid temporary measure to remove the vulnerable code. Always inform site stakeholders before major changes.

Q: How long should I keep WAF virtual patches?

A: Keep them until you’ve applied the vendor’s security update and verified it on a staging environment and in production. After updating and validating, remove the temporary rules to avoid blocking legitimate new plugin features.

---

WP-Firewall recommendations (practical rule set)

For customers using WP-Firewall, we recommend these targeted rules after vulnerability disclosure and before update:

• Rule 1 — Block contributor-initiated admin actions:
  • If request includes plugin-specific admin action AND authenticated user role <= contributor THEN block or challenge.
• Rule 2 — Require valid nonce for sensitive actions:
  • If request to plugin admin endpoint AND nonce absent/invalid THEN block.
• Rule 3 — Rate limit plugin admin actions from non-admin IPs:
  • If more than X requests per minute to plugin actions from same IP AND IP not whitelisted THEN throttle.
• Rule 4 — Quarantine suspicious uploads:
  • If an upload request attempts to write .php under uploads or plugin folders AND file content contains obfuscation patterns THEN quarantine and alert.

Our team can apply these virtual patch rules centrally and test them to avoid false positives; for multi-site environments this gives fast, safe mitigation while you update plugins site-by-site.

---

New: Start with WP-Firewall Free — Essential protection for every WordPress site

Protecting your WordPress site shouldn’t be complicated or expensive. WP-Firewall’s Basic (Free) plan gives you essential protections that stop common attack vectors and buys you time to patch plugins safely:

• Managed firewall with pre-configured rulesets tuned for WordPress.
• Unlimited bandwidth and WAF coverage for all sites on the plan.
• Malware scanner and mitigation for OWASP Top 10 risks.

If you want to test our protections quickly, sign up for the free plan and get real-time monitoring and virtual patching for vulnerabilities like the Survey Maker broken access control issue: https://my.wp-firewall.com/buy/wp-firewall-free-plan/

---

Long-term security program: beyond this single vulnerability

Preventing future incidents requires a programmatic approach:

• Vulnerability management: maintain an inventory of plugins and their current versions; prioritize high-risk components for immediate patching.
• Change control: test updates on staging sites before production rollouts.
• Least privilege model: limit accounts and capabilities; implement workflows for contributor content that reduce exposure.
• Continuous monitoring: use a WAF, file integrity monitoring, and centralized logging so anomalies are detected quickly.
• Incident playbook: have an IR plan and tested backups — speed is crucial when attacks unfold.

---

Closing — practical next steps for site owners

1. Check whether Survey Maker is active on your site. If yes, update to 5.1.9.5 immediately.
2. If you cannot update immediately, deactivate the plugin and apply firewall rules to block plugin-specific admin actions.
3. Audit low-privilege users and monitor admin-ajax/REST activity for abnormal patterns.
4. Consider a managed firewall with virtual patching if you manage several sites or cannot guarantee instant updates.
5. Back up your site and test restores regularly.

We know disclosure windows and patching schedules can be challenging for multi-site teams and agencies. If you need fast protection, WP-Firewall can apply virtual patching rules and monitoring to reduce risk while you perform controlled updates.

---

If you want help assessing your exposure or implementing virtual patches for the Survey Maker vulnerability, our security engineers are available to assist. For immediate and hands-on protection, explore WP-Firewall’s free protection plan and get started today: https://my.wp-firewall.com/buy/wp-firewall-free-plan/

---

参考文献と参考文献

• CVE-2025-64276 (Survey Maker <= 5.1.9.4) — ensure you have updated to 5.1.9.5 or later.
• WordPress role and capability documentation — review and minimize privileges.
• OWASP Top 10 guidance on Broken Access Control — helpful background on risk types.

---

Author

WP-Firewall セキュリティチーム — Experienced WordPress security engineers helping site owners detect, mitigate and recover from plugin vulnerabilities.