Nom du plugin	Related Posts Lite
Type of Vulnerability	CSRF
CVE Number	CVE-2025-9618
Urgence	Faible
CVE Publish Date	2025-08-29
Source URL	CVE-2025-9618

Urgent: CVE-2025-9618 — Cross-Site Request Forgery in Related Posts Lite (<= 1.12) — What WordPress Site Owners Must Do Now

Auteur: WP-Firewall Security Team
Date: 2025-08-30

Aperçu

On 29 August 2025 a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting the WordPress plugin “Related Posts Lite” (versions <= 1.12) was publicly disclosed and assigned CVE-2025-9618. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 4.3 (Low), but it still merits attention because it may allow an attacker to coerce authenticated administrative or privileged users to perform unwanted actions while they are logged in.

This post is written from the perspective of WP-Firewall — a WordPress firewall and security provider — and aims to explain the issue in plain language, describe realistic impacts against WordPress sites, outline immediate and long-term mitigations, and show how a web application firewall (WAF) like WP-Firewall can protect you while an official plugin patch is not yet available.

NOTE: If your site uses Related Posts Lite and the plugin version is 1.12 or earlier, please read the mitigation and detection sections carefully and act accordingly.

What is CSRF (a short primer)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is a class of web vulnerability where an attacker tricks a victim who is authenticated to a site (for example, an admin logged into WordPress) into making an HTTP request the victim did not intend. These requests appear to the target site as legitimate actions from the authenticated user, because the browser automatically includes session cookies and other authentication tokens.

In WordPress, plugin and theme code that accepts and acts on POST or GET requests must take explicit steps to verify the request’s origin and the user’s intent. The recommended mechanism is:

• Use WordPress nonces (wp_create_nonce / wp_verify_nonce) for state-changing actions.
• Verify user capabilities (current_user_can).
• Avoid performing sensitive actions solely based on untrusted request parameters.
• Restrict actions to authenticated users where required.

When a plugin fails to perform these checks, a CSRF vulnerability can exist.

Summary of the Related Posts Lite vulnerability

• Affected software: Related Posts Lite plugin for WordPress
• Versions vulnérables : <= 1.12
• Vulnerability type: Contrefaçon de demande intersite (CSRF)
• CVE: CVE-2025-9618
• Reported: 29 August 2025
• CVSS: 4.3 (Low)
• Public status: No official fix available at time of disclosure

Patch details published in the advisory indicate missing or insufficient protections for one or more HTTP endpoints implemented by the plugin. In practical terms, this can let a remote attacker craft a web page that, when visited by an authenticated WordPress user (often an admin or editor), causes that user’s browser to submit requests to the vulnerable site and trigger actions that the plugin exposes.

Who is at risk?

• Sites running Related Posts Lite version 1.12 or earlier.
• Sites where at least one privileged user (administrator, editor, or another role with elevated permissions required by the plugin) can be tricked into visiting an attacker-controlled page or link while logged in.
• Managed or multi-admin environments where staff routinely browse the web while logged in to the WP admin dashboard.

Important nuance: CSRF attacks do not require the attacker to be authenticated to the target site — but they do require that one of the target site’s authenticated users visit a page under the attacker’s control (or click a malicious link). The attacker’s ability to influence outcomes depends on which actions are exposed without proper server-side verification. Even when a vulnerability is rated “low”, it can be chained with other issues (weak credentials, plugin misconfigurations) to escalate impact.

Potential real-world impacts

Because the vulnerability allows forced requests to the plugin’s endpoints, possible impacts include (but are not limited to):

• Changing plugin settings (if the plugin exposes settings updates via an unprotected endpoint).
• Toggling the behavior of the related-posts features that appear on your site.
• Triggering actions that could modify content, create posts, change options, or even delete data — depending on what endpoints are affected.
• Using the plugin’s endpoint as a pivot to trigger other code paths in the site that have weaker checks.
• Confusion or noise in logs and admin screens that could mask other malicious activity.

While CSRF itself does not directly exfiltrate data, forced operations can assist an attacker in achieving persistence or privilege escalation when combined with other weaknesses (weak credential reuse, plugin vulnerabilities that allow code execution, etc.).

Why the vulnerability is rated “Low” — but still matters

The CVSS rating of 4.3 reflects limited technical severity under a standard scoring model: the vulnerability needs an authenticated user (a privileged actor) to be tricked, and the actions available may be relatively constrained. Nevertheless:

• Many WordPress sites have multiple administrators or editors, some of whom may browse the web while still logged into the WP dashboard.
• Low-severity issues are commonly weaponized because they are easy to automate at scale; an attacker can target thousands of sites waiting for any admin to trip the trap.
• There is currently no official plugin fix — so sites remain exposed until the plugin author issues a patched release.

Exploitation model (high level, non-executable)

A typical CSRF scenario for this plugin would look like:

1. Attacker figures out a plugin HTTP endpoint that performs a state change (e.g., updates settings, triggers an action).
2. Attack crafts an HTML form or an image tag / script that results in the victim browser issuing the same request (including cookies) to the target site, possibly with the necessary parameters filled in.
3. An authenticated admin visits the attacker’s page while logged into WordPress.
4. The browser submits the forged request to the vulnerable site; the site accepts and executes the request because it lacks nonce/capability verification.
5. The attacker-installed values now exist on the site, or actions were taken.

We are deliberately not providing full exploit code; the goal of this post is to inform and defend, not to enable abuse.

How to detect if you were targeted or compromised

If you suspect your site was targeted, watch for these signs:

• Unexpected changes to plugin settings or related-posts behavior.
• New or modified posts, options, or plugins you did not authorize.
• Admin actions recorded in logs at times when admins were not performing those actions.
• Access logs that show POST or GET requests to plugin-specific admin endpoints from unusual referrers or from third-party origin sites.
• Outgoing indicators such as redirects or connections to unknown domains after admin operations.

Useful detection steps:

• Inspect web server and WordPress logs for POST requests to admin-ajax.php, admin-post.php, or plugin-specific endpoints that contain suspicious parameters and have external referrer values.
• Use forensic/malware scanning tools to scan for modifications to plugin files or unexpected file uploads.
• Check the WordPress user activity/history (if you have a plugin that records it) to see who performed what action and from which IP.
• Look for unusual scheduled tasks (cron jobs), unknown users, or altered roles/capabilities.

Immediate mitigations you can apply right now

If you run Related Posts Lite <= 1.12, take immediate steps to reduce risk until an official patch is available:

1. Evaluate the plugin:
   • If the plugin is non-essential to your site’s functionality, disable and uninstall it.
   • If you need the plugin, move to the containment steps below.
2. Limit administrative exposure:
   • Ask administrators and editors to log out of WordPress when not actively managing content.
   • Enforce two-factor authentication (2FA) for all admin accounts.
3. Harden access to wp-admin:
   • Restrict access to /wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php by IP where possible (e.g., allowlist trusted IPs).
   • Add HTTP Basic Authentication in front of wp-admin to reduce exposure to CSRF vectors (note: ensure Basic Auth is compatible with your workflows).
4. Temporarily add a blocking WAF rule:
   • Block POST requests to plugin endpoints that lack expected nonce parameters or have suspicious referers. If you use WP-Firewall, we can push a virtual patch (see below).
   • Block external-site-originated requests to admin endpoints (deny requests where the Referer header is not your site) — with caveats for valid cross-origin use.
5. Reduce the number of users with admin-level privileges:
   • Review user accounts and revoke admin roles from users who do not need them.
6. Monitor and back up:
   • Take a fresh backup before making changes.
   • Increase monitoring of logs and user actions.
   • Snapshot your site files and database to enable fast rollback if needed.
7. Communicate with your staff:
   • Alert your admins and editors about the issue and advise them not to click unknown links or visit suspicious sites while logged in.

Recommended long-term remediations (for plugin authors and developers)

If you are a plugin developer, or if you are coordinating with a plugin vendor to get a fix released, these are the key actions:

• Verify nonces on all state-changing endpoints.
  • Utiliser wp_verify_nonce() on POST/GET actions that modify state.
  • Ensure the nonce action and name match the nonce created in the admin forms.
• Enforce capability checks.
  • Utiliser current_user_can('manage_options') or a capability appropriate to the action.
  • Never perform privileged operations based solely on request data.
• Avoid exposing sensitive actions via unauthenticated AJAX endpoints.
  • Where practical, keep privileged operations server-side and limited to authenticated sessions.
• Use proper HTTP methods.
  • Utilize POST for state changes (not GET), and validate input carefully.
• Add CSRF protection for REST endpoints.
  • If you expose REST API routes, require authentication or apply nonce/capability checks accordingly.

Example of proper nonce + capability checking in WordPress plugin code:

// This is a safe pattern for processing a form submission in admin.
if ( ! isset( $_POST['my_plugin_nonce'] ) || ! wp_verify_nonce( $_POST['my_plugin_nonce'], 'my_plugin_action' ) ) {
    wp_die( 'Nonce verification failed', 'Forbidden', array( 'response' => 403 ) );
}

if ( ! current_user_can( 'manage_options' ) ) {
    wp_die( 'Insufficient permissions', 'Forbidden', array( 'response' => 403 ) );
}

// Now it is safe to perform the state-changing action
$option_value = sanitize_text_field( $_POST['option_field'] );
update_option( 'my_plugin_option', $option_value );

• Add unit/integration tests to verify that routes reject requests missing valid nonces or authentication.

How a Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects you — and what we do at WP-Firewall

A WAF provides a defensive layer that can block exploit attempts in real time, even before a vendor releases a plugin patch. At WP-Firewall we offer managed WAF coverage and virtual patching designed for WordPress-specific attack patterns. Key benefits of WAF-based mitigation for a CSRF issue like CVE-2025-9618:

• Block forged requests that attempt to execute privileged plugin endpoints.
• Detect requests that are missing expected nonce parameters and block them before they reach PHP code.
• Apply rate-limiting to reduce automated exploitation attempts at scale.
• Provide a rapid virtual patch (rule) to neutralize the vulnerability while the plugin author prepares an official fix.

What a practical WAF rule might check (high-level, conceptual):

• If an incoming request targets a known plugin endpoint or admin-ajax.php/admin-post.php and:
  • The HTTP method is POST (or other state-changing method) AND
  • The request lacks the expected wpnonce parameter OR
  • The Referer header is from an external domain OR
  • The user-agent is suspicious or matched to automated tool signatures
• THEN block or challenge the request with a CAPTCHA/HTTP 403 response.

We carefully craft rules to minimize false positives. For sites that require the plugin endpoint to be used by third parties, the rule can be tuned to allow legitimate traffic while blocking requests that clearly look like CSRF attempts.

Example WAF rule logic (conceptual, non-vendor-specific)

• Condition:
  • Request path matches /wp-admin/admin-post.php or contains “related-posts” plugin endpoint
  • AND HTTP method is POST
  • AND (missing parameter “my_plugin_nonce” OR wpnonce not present)
  • AND Referer is not your site (optional condition)
• Action:
  • Block request (HTTP 403) or present challenge
  • Log the event with details for analysis

Note: Exact rule implementation must be tested on each site to avoid blocking legitimate integrations.

For site owners: step-by-step checklist (fast to follow)

1. Confirm plugin and version:
   • Dashboard -> Plugins -> Related Posts Lite -> verify version. If <= 1.12, proceed.
2. If plugin is non-essential:
   • Deactivate and delete the plugin immediately.
3. If plugin is required:
   • Restrict admin access by IP or HTTP Basic Auth.
   • Enable 2FA for all admin users.
   • Ask admins to log out when not working and avoid browsing unknown sites while logged in.
   • Add WP-Firewall or another managed WAF and request emergency rule to block CSRF patterns for this plugin endpoint.
   • Take a site backup.
4. Monitor logs:
   • Watch for suspicious POST requests and rapid changes.
5. Patch when available:
   • When plugin author releases an update that implements nonce and capability checks, validate and update.
6. Post-incident:
   • Run a full malware scan.
   • Verify integrity of critical files and database contents.
   • Rotate administrator passwords and API keys if any suspicious activity is observed.

How to tune detection to reduce false positives

Blocking every request with a missing nonce can yield false positives in complex sites that use legitimate third-party integrations or custom admin flows. Recommendations:

• Identify legitimate endpoints and whitelist trusted IP addresses or service user-agents for those endpoints.
• Use selective blocking: block only external requests where the Referer is not your domain and the nonce is absent.
• Use a staged approach: log-and-monitor first, then block once rules are verified safe.
• Coordinate with developers to add explicit nonce checks so the WAF can be relaxed.

Indicators of exploitation and post-incident recovery

If you confirm an attack or suspect exploitation:

• Revoke compromised administrative credentials immediately.
• Rotate API keys and secret tokens stored in the site configuration.
• Restore from a known-good backup if any core files were modified.
• Perform a file integrity check (compare with a backup or trusted source).
• Scan the site for backdoors or webshells and eradicate them.
• Contact your hosting provider if you suspect server-level compromise for a hosting-side scan.
• Consider professional incident response if the compromise is deep or production-critical.

Frequently asked questions

Q: Do I need to panic if my site shows this plugin?
A: No. Panic is not helpful. But you must act quickly: follow the mitigation checklist above (backup, reduce exposure, enable WAF mitigations or disable the plugin). The quick steps can reduce the chance of exploitation.

Q: Will updating WordPress core help?
A: Keeping WordPress core up-to-date is always recommended. However, this vulnerability is in a plugin; updating core alone will not fix it. Wait for the plugin’s vendor to release a patched plugin version, and apply it as soon as it’s available.

Q: Why not just rely on nonces in the browser?
A: Nonces are server-side protections that must be validated server-side with wp_verify_nonce. If a plugin generates nonces but does not verify them when processing requests, nonces provide no protection.

Q: Could this be used to inject malware?
A: Direct CSRF typically forces legitimate actions rather than injecting files. But forced actions can be leveraged in chained attacks to install plugins or trigger other vulnerabilities, so the risk should not be dismissed.

Why proactive virtual patching matters

Vendor patches are ideal, but they are not always immediate. Virtual patching (applying targeted WAF rules) buys time. It reduces the attack surface in production environments without modifying plugin code or waiting for releases. Virtual patches can:

• Stop exploitation at the edge before traffic reaches PHP.
• Be applied and removed quickly.
• Be tuned for minimal business impact.

At WP-Firewall we provide virtual patching as part of our managed service offerings — our emergency rule set focuses on blocking known exploit patterns, including CSRF vectors that target missing nonce checks.

New: Start with WP-Firewall Free Plan for immediate protection

Protect your site quickly with WP-Firewall Basic (Free)

If you want a fast way to reduce the risk posed by vulnerabilities like CVE-2025-9618, our Basic (Free) plan delivers essential protection for WordPress sites. The free plan includes a managed firewall capable of virtual patching, unlimited bandwidth, a WAF tuned for WordPress, a malware scanner, and mitigation for OWASP Top 10 risks. It’s an easy way to raise your baseline security immediately while you plan longer-term remediation.

Sign up and enable essential protections right away: https://my.wp-firewall.com/buy/wp-firewall-free-plan/

(We also offer paid plans that include automatic malware removal, IP blacklist/whitelist control, monthly security reports, and advanced virtual patching if you need deeper, ongoing protection.)

How WP-Firewall would mitigate this specific CSRF issue

• Rapid analysis: Our security team maps the plugin’s endpoints and identifies parameters used in state-change operations.
• Rule creation: We craft rules that block POST requests to those endpoints that lack expected nonces, or that originate from external referers.
• Rollout: Rules are applied globally to affected customers in minutes.
• Monitoring and tuning: Our security analysts monitor logs for false positives and tune rules to avoid impacting legitimate traffic.
• Patch follow-up: After the plugin author releases an official fix, we remove or relax the virtual patch once the site applies the update.

Final recommendations (what to do in the next 24–72 hours)

• Immediately check plugin version; if using Related Posts Lite <= 1.12, decide whether to disable it.
• If disabling is not possible: apply containment — lock down admin access, enable 2FA, reduce admin accounts, and request a WAF rule from your security provider (or use WP-Firewall free plan to apply managed protections).
• Back up your site and increase monitoring for suspicious admin actions.
• Educate your editorial and admin staff to avoid browsing unknown or untrusted web pages while logged in.
• Keep an eye for an official plugin update and apply it promptly when available.

Closing thoughts

CSRF vulnerabilities are often underrated because they require user interaction, but they are trivially easy to exploit at scale and can have outsized operational impact in multi-admin environments. When a plugin exposes unprotected endpoints that perform state-changing operations, the best defense is a combination of:

• Prompt vendor patching,
• Robust development practices (nonces + capability checks),
• Defensive measures at the perimeter (WAF / virtual patching),
• And basic hygiene: 2FA, role pruning, backups, and staff awareness.

WP-Firewall exists to help you manage that perimeter protection quickly and safely. If you need support implementing any of the mitigations listed here, our team is available to guide you through the steps, help deploy virtual patches, or assist with incident response.

Stay safe and act now — even low-severity issues deserve a measured, timely response.

References & further reading

• CVE-2025-9618 (official CVE entry)
  https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9618
• WordPress developer documentation: Nonces and capability checks
  https://developer.wordpress.org/plugins/security/nonces/
• WordPress hardening guides and administrative best practices
  https://wordpress.org/support/article/hardening-wordpress/

---

If you’d like a concise checklist you can copy/paste into operations tickets or email to your team, reply and we’ll provide a ready-to-use incident response checklist tailored to your hosting environment and workflow.